Democritus wrote:I will vote for science, as a follower of dialectical materialism...

Democritus wrote:I will vote for science, as a follower of dialectical materialism...
Princessvenom wrote:
MySanityDoesFly wrote:![]()
End of debate, surely.
Princessvenom wrote:
Ilona wrote:I've yet to see anyone scientifically prove that a God doesn't exist.![]()
muskurov wrote:Ilona wrote:I've yet to see anyone scientifically prove that a God doesn't exist.![]()
The religious believers are the one who have to prove that god exists. After all it is thier own theory. If I claim that gravity exists I would have to and will prove it to you. I wouldn't expect you to prove it doesn't.
muskurov wrote:The religious believers are the one who have to prove that god exists. After all it is thier own theory. If I claim that gravity exists I would have to and will prove it to you. I wouldn't expect you to prove it doesn't.
Lycaon wrote:Logically it is impossible to prove non-existence in the first place.
Ilona wrote:The main point I was trying to communicate still stands, though. I don't see why the two should be mutually exclusive.
muskurov wrote:My opinion is that when science answers a lifelong question, which was before answered only by religion (and the answer is always "God"), then is the moment that religious people start to be offensive against science. I don't think that scientist actually care much about what others believe in. But when an experiment or research shows a hole in one's system of beliefs he/she is outraged and vicious.
Return to Arts, Literature and Philosophy
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests